Faculty of Philosophy
Centre for Medical Ethics and Law

Dr. Margaret Thornfield, PhD
Professor of Medical Ethics
m.thornfield@cam.ac.uk

Ethical Review: Marrow Conductivity Modifications
Case Study 3E-1873B

Date: 15 April 2029
Subject: Unauthorized Biomedical Modification
Case Reference: NAILA-3E-1873B

This urgent review examines the medical data leaked from "Blacksite Cathedral" operations, specifically regarding Subject 3E-1873B's anomalous marrow conductivity readings. The findings represent the most severe violation of medical ethics principles I have encountered in my 20-year career.

Primary Ethical Violations

Comparative Conductivity Analysis

Sample Type Conductivity (ohmâ‹…m) Notes
Normal Human Marrow 15-30 Standard baseline
Subject 3E-1873B 0.3 99% conductivity increase
Copper Wire 0.017 Industrial conductor reference
Saline Solution 0.2 Electrolyte comparison

Analysis: Subject's marrow conductivity approaches that of metallic conductors. This level of modification requires systematic replacement of organic tissue with synthetic conductive material.

Medical Implications

The conductivity readings indicate extensive skeletal system modification. Preliminary analysis suggests:

These modifications represent unprecedented human experimentation without consent, supervision, or ethical oversight.

Legal and Professional Obligations

Under the Nuremberg Code, Helsinki Declaration, and UK medical ethics guidelines, this case demands immediate action:

  1. Subject Protection: Immediate medical evaluation and support
  2. Investigation: Full inquiry into modification procedures
  3. Accountability: Prosecution of responsible parties
  4. Prevention: Safeguards against future violations

Conclusion

Subject 3E-1873B represents a victim of systematic medical experimentation conducted without consent, oversight, or regard for human dignity. The modification of her skeletal system for apparent signal transmission purposes constitutes a crime against medical ethics and human rights.

I recommend immediate intervention by medical authorities, law enforcement, and international human rights organizations. This case may represent the tip of a larger program of unauthorized human experimentation.

Dr. Margaret Thornfield, PhD
Professor of Medical Ethics
University of Cambridge
15 April 2029

This report has been forwarded to the General Medical Council, Cambridge Police, and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors for immediate review.